Everyone wants to have cohesive teams that achieve results – but how can it be done with data scientists who each work on their own projects and interact in different ways?
There are three factors – business, technology, and mathematics – that are the trifecta of effective data science. Business gives you the problem, technology and mathematics bring the techniques that make sense of the data. Each of these factors need to be considered when framing a data science team.
This data science life cycle portrays the steps that data must go through time and time again until the customer accepts it.

What does it look like to have trust within a team?
- Being unguarded and genuine with one another
- Giving one another the benefit of the doubt rather than jumping to conclusions
- Asking one another for help and input regarding your areas of responsibility
- Apologizing and being open about weaknesses and mistakes
With data science and teams, there is an interplay between trust and healthy conflict. Debate around that conflict is crucial. The conflict cannot take place without the trust. In our team, there are different personality types that are learning to work together. As we learn more about each other, we are able to trust each other more.
How can you have productive conflict on a team?
- Voicing your opinions even at the risk of causing disagreement
- Seeking out your teammates opinions during meetings
- confronting and dealing with the most important – and difficult – issues
- Exploring everyone’s ideas to uncover the best solutions
The personality spectrum is where you need to find out what your type is and where each team member falls on the spectrum. There is one end with the spirited debater, who tends to be expressive and shows convictions during debate, and on the other end, the calm debater, who tends to use measured dialogue and remains largely unruffled. After that has been done, one can figure out how to work together and develop that trust.


What does it look like to have clarity on a team?
- Supporting group decisions even if you initially disagree and embracing some risk
- Being clear about the team’s overall direction and priorities
- Ending discussions with clear and specific resolutions and calls to action
- Leaving meetings confident that everyone is committed to the decisions that were agreed upon
Overall, as you get a team moving, people get more comfortable and their voices are heard. If you want to have meetings that create results, rather than having meeting to have meetings, there needs to be accountability. As a member of the team, you are accountable for a piece of the work.
If you are doing work simply because your boss said to do something that you do not agree with, your commitment suffers and the final product suffers. All of these pillars lead to team members being bought into the idea of what you are doing as a company. Feeling pressure from your peers is a nice way of working because you do not want to let the team down. You then feel good about accomplishing your part.
What does it take to have accountability in a team?
- Finding areas of actionability in the solution being deployed
- Feeling pressure from your peers and the expectation to perform
- Confronting peers about problems in their respective areas of responsibility
- Questioning one another about current approaches and methods

How can you share your business results?
- Valuing the business solution and its impact versus the technology stack being used
- Willingly making sacrifices in your area for the good of the team
- When the team fails to achieve collective goals, taking personal responsibility to improve the team’s performance
- Being quick to point out the contributions and achievements of others








